Sunday, May 3, 2009

Coen Brothers: Are they for REAL?


All throughout this unit I have examined all the films and realized that there hasn't been one that I liked. While this is rare and uncommon for me I do see the reasoning. I'm really into films that have the happy ending and everything turns out well. But what I realized while watching these films is that they really don't and that really makes the movie bad in my eyes. At the end of all them I realized how much of my life had been wasted watching movies that had no good endings and I that left me feeling down.
The most recent film that I can compare to these is The Wrestler. It as well as these had no good ending worth writing about. Randy's daughter never forgives him and he never gets with the stripper who he really likes and we are led to assume that he dies in the end. It was just a long and depressing film that had no good ending because the whole movie your rooting for him to be the guy he wants and time and time again we see that not come true and the film lets us down. It's one of those movies thats supposed to be like realistic, like fairy tales don't really exist and I just didn't like it.
Another element of the films that I didn't like was that they all took place in the middle of no where, this gave us the idea from the beginning that there was just no way out of the situations the characters might get into. I also didn't like how the movies not only are made cheaply but they actually looked cheaped the way that they were filmed. I'm sorry I like the movies that spend and make a lot of money. It makes it more worth my time knowing that this isn't just a film anyone could make with the clothes and special features they used. Overall I would say I'm not a fan of the Coen Brothers and I have yet to see any of their films that I like.
My hope is that this next unit will catch my eye and really keep me intrigued in the dialogue of a foreign film. My hope is that they will have happy endings and it won't be like a dead end movie where you know the endings not good and there is no changing it. Until next time...

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Robert Altman



I loved all of the Altman films that we watched because they each had a unique style that is unseen by other movies. My favorite was The Long Goodbye. I usually don't go for movies from the 70s just because from what I've seen they weren't very good but I actually liked this one a lot. I would recommend this to anyone even if they aren't a fan of Altman I would have to say that they need to look at this film before they judge him completely. I'll admit that Nashville was not my favorite film of all the ones we have seen from him but it has potential to be different in a sense that it was really bare boned, ruff film. There was no perfection about this film which I think kind of gives it an edge if you will. Finally The Player was an interesting perspective on the Hollywood behind the scenes kind of movie. I liked it though and I hope that I can view some more of his films in the future. Hopefully he lives up to his name and his other films are as good as these ones.
What I liked about these films the most was that they were really realistic so they are pretty easy to compare to today. For instance some may say that Nashville or at least the killing at the end compares to the death of John Lennon. I would not agree with this just because the person who killed John Lennon at a reason where as the killer of Barbra Jean did not or at least they didn't show that. Then I think that everyone can compare to The Long Goodbye just because I know that everyone has been used by someone before whether it was for friendship or some other reason, I think we all can say that we've been there. But maybe we aren't all as big of push overs as Marlowe but we still can feel for the guy. Finally The Player of course can be compared to Hollywood today I'm sure that there people that get their stories turned down all of the time for whatever reason and I'm sure that these people receive hate mail and death threats all the time. They just don't kill the suspected stocker and then fall in love with his girlfriend. Whats weird is that while they are different they have a reoccurring theme.
In all of Altman's films that we watched the reoccuring theme is that not everything is as it seems. For instance in Nashville we never know what's going to happen because we getting pulled around from story to story never really stopping to look around at the surroundings in order to see the facts. Even in the end when we know whats going to happen its so unexpected that we almost convince ourselves that it wasn't the guy with the violin box who killed her it was the officer. Its weird how the brain works. But anyways then theres Marlowe in The Long Goodbye, we never really see that his friend really did the killings we are led as Marlowe is to believe that its the mofia like guy who killed her. Yet again a suprise ending, I think thats what makes his movies so good because in the end they leave you speechless like how did I miss that. Same with in The Player we follow the character of Griffin and the whole movie we are thinking like him and we as well as he fall for the same mistake. We all overlooked the real killer when in reality it should have been so obvious nothing is that easy and nothing disappears over night. This is a director that should be missed in future classes.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

BUBBLE


This movie was a let down compared to other movies he has directed. For instance all the Ocean Movies, I thought they were all really well but I just couldn't follow this one. It was really boring and had an Ed Wood feel. Bubble was probably one of the worst movies I have ever seen before. Steven Soderbergh could have done so much more then he did with the film, while the plot was bad I thought he choose a good range of characters. It was good to see new faces among a well known director like himself. Anyways the plot starts out with these two lower class factory workers named Martha (Debbie Doebereiner) and Kyle (Dustin James Ashley). They are really good friends and all is well until someone new comes to work at the factory and Martha notices Kyle taking an interest. This upsets her because Kyle is her best friend and she doesn't want some dumb girl to take that away from her. So Martha befriends the girl, Rose (Misty Wilkins) in order to gain an upper hand and to show Kyle just how much she cares about him. But it just doesn't seem to be enough because Rose agrees to go on a date with Kyle. Martha can't believe it and finally breaks down and kills Rose in order to keep the friendship she and Kyle once had. But little does Martha know that she actually killed Rose because she blackedout after she did it, totally forgetting everything that had happened that night. But it's not really a shocker because the whole story line is pretty perdictable. I was not impressed one bit I totally would give this movie like one star it was so bad. But I liked that he picked no name actors and actresses because it made the parts seem more realistic, it helps that you can't visualize them in different parts that they have played in the past. This whole movie was very different then other movies he has directed in the past.


Everything about this movie screams Ed Wood. The scenes were poorly shot, known of the scenes really seemed to fit well together, and the story line was just terrible. This is not at all like previous movies that Soderbergh has directed. In his other movies they seem to have a meaning like the Ocean movies are about stealing from the rich and giving to the poor or unlucky and Erin Brockovich is about helping the unfortunate and poor people so that they will no longer be hurt by the big corporations. His narration is always changing so you could say that this movie was just another hanger in the closet of changes he seems to be experimenting with. His characters are different then most of his films because they are no name and for most this is the only movie they have ever been in. Most if not all of his previous works have famous people like Julia Roberts and Brad Pitt. But I don't think this is a bad thing because it adds to the plot line in making it more realistic almost like a documentary. All of his work is good and I think he isn't comparable to anyone because he is own unique person and therefore he shouldn't put in any catergories with other directors. This film however is in a catergory of it's own. It really should be put as one of Ed Woods pieces. It was the worst movie by far that I have ever seen in my lifetime. I would agree with Colin Covert when he said "Soderbergh set out to make a movie about shallow people, but wound up delivering a shallow movie". He's right this movie is one of the worst movies he has ever directed and put out therefore giving it the title of a shallow movie. It had no depth and no deeper meaning it was just kind of put out there and thats that nothing more to it. http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/movies/11524051.html. But I don't agree with Claudia Puig when she says "you have the desire to go back and see it again". This is totally not the case, lets just say if I could I would burn in and get it so no one else would have to go through the torture of watching it. http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2006-01-26-bubble_x.htm. Overall I would not recommend this film to anyone because its simply a waste of time and energy. I give the film one out of ten. The only question I have is why on Earth Soderbergh continued it?